|
|
|
View single Blog Entry
|
Tuesday, November 27, 2007 at 01:41 AM
|
*I want to bring Hand Tinting back in the main stream. Since we have our computers and high tech soft ware we fail to realize that computer generated imagery or photos are not the same as in the past. The reason is, that the computer lacks Zone "A" and Zone "B". Its merely a copy. All computer generated photos or prints will oxidize or fade. The sole purpose of making Photographs are to record and document historical events. Archiving Photos that are computer generated defeats this goal. In museums you will only find Black and White Photos, they know that any other type of print won't last long enough to achieve their objective.
*When we look back in the early 1800's we see images that were produced that still exist today. What if our Great masters used pixels to record there Art. They would have never dreamed of wasting there time and effort to gain fame by employing methods other than the Classical techniques to create their Art. When history is written, those who have negatives and Hand developed Prints will have works of Arts that will be priceless.
*The Great masters such Van Goghs, Picasso's, Rembrandts, Cezanne's, Seraut's, El greco,s, Constables, Botticellis, Angelico's and Bounnarroti's would not exist today as we know them if they had used digital assisted soft ware to create their works of Art. I have over 50,000 images and over 90,000 negatives that will be worth more than any digital print made today.
*Photo Art has been around in the main stream for quite some time. No one has change or improved on what George Eastman, Joeseph Niepce, Giovanni Battista, Thomas Wedgwood and Louis Jacques Mande Daguerre attempted . The computer can never allow any one the freedom that gives you the ability to capture an image as on sees it. Ansel Adams was the last person to that gave us a new set of rules and technique.
*I have developed a "2" Zone that takes his ideas and the other great Photographers of the past and improve how we see and reproduce our Photos.
Don't miss out, if you can have the luck of buying a old Photo of the past, you will own tomorrows Picassos' Van Goghs' or even an Rembrandt.
*The only worth while investment in todays Art Market will be a Hand Tinted Photograph. The other Great works of Art merely exchange owners and becomes more expensive in the process.
|
Comments (1)
|
| Comments: |
|
|
| Interesting |
An interesting blog post. But a bit skewed. Wanting to bring back hand coloring is great. It's a wonderful artform. But to say that the "sole purpose of making Photographs are to record and document historical events," is untrue and borders on the ridiculous. There are all kinds of people making photographs for all kinds of reasons. They're all legitimate and all should be encouraged. The value of art should be in its content not in its longevity. Archival qualities are definitely important. But they shouldn't be how art is judged. Content is always king in my book. And some people use computers to create it. That doesn't make it any less powerful or ultimately valuable. |
|
Comment by Photo-John on Wednesday, December 5, 2007 at 08:45 PM
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 AM.
|
|
|
Follow Us On Facebook & Twitter!
|
|
|
